Further to my previous post on the Syndicate review forum on Linda Zerilli’s A Democratic Theory of Judgment (also available here), my own comments are now live, as well as a generous response from Linda herself. My own thoughts focus on Zerilli’s critical engagement with the ontological turn to theories of affect in some strands of political theory, and how her own treatment of these issues overlaps with but also differs from the approach articulated by thinkers associated with nonsite.org including Walter Benn Michaels, Todd Cronan, and Ruth Leys.
Pingback: Intentionality and objectivity: Todd Cronan on Zerilli (and me) | Pop Theory
Pingback: Logical Geographies of Action: nonsite.org review forum on Ruth Leys’ The Ascent of Affect | Pop Theory